What is love? Actually, love is too large and too complex to be truly understood or measured. Words cannot suffice for an accurate definition. However, this blog post would not have been attempted if I did not believe it to have some value in explaining the many views held about love. People can look the world over and will never arrive at a truly satisfactory definition of the word. Websters Collegiate Dictionary defines love as "a strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties." But love cannot be so narrowly defined because their are many types of love. True Love, falling in love, making love, imperfect love, unconditional love, brotherly love, and so on and so on. Many people see love in many ways. I see love as the unselfish giving of ones self for the purpose of for yourself and/or the other person or thing.
Many people are generally confused towards the nature of love. A person may think that because his mother never let him ride the bus to school until his senior year out of fear of his getting hurt would be love. Actually what motivated the mother could have been something other than love. This would deal in a person's conscious and unconscious purpose in the mind.
One cannot love another unless he or she loves themselves first. It would be impossible, for example, to shun our own self discipline and at the same time be disciplined in our care for another. In other words, we cannot be a source of strength or companionship to someone if we are not the same to ourselves. If we neglect that aspect of who we are the relationship, no matter how passionate or dedicated it appears to be, will be short lived as a result of a break down in the commitment on one end.
Today, there is this view of love as being "feminized love". A term coined by Sociologist A. Douglass in 1977. He claims society today has taken the concept of love and put it into a nice little package which defines love in terms only of emotional expression, verbal self disclosure, and affection. This leaves no room for the physical aspects of love. By physical, I am not talking about the outward display of physical attraction, but the providing of instrumental help in physical activities.
To reinforce this, another study was conducted by Stinnett, Carter, and Montgomery in 1972 in which by questionnaire, couples were asked to define the basic needs of marriage. Among those listed were love, personality, fulfillment, respect, communication, finding meaning, and integrating past experiences. Love itself was measured by feelings. Providing help in the physical sense was not reflected upon.
Also, men and women tend to have different views and ways of loving. Women, on one hand tend to express love in a verbal sense, wanting to share personal experiences and feel emotionally secure. On the other hand, men show their love by more physical means, such as helping in activities and the obvious, sex.
Love also gives men a certain aspect of power over women. Study upon study has shown that the current concept of love has exaggerated women's dependency on men because society tends to put across the view that women need a love based relationship more than men and this puts women at a disadvantage. However, there is another approach and view that suggests men also depend on marriage as a form of secure loving relations more than women. Women tend to have closer ties to friends and relatives which reduces the need for a companion.
Because in today's society we emphasize self growth and autonomy, most people have unconscious weapons against dependency in love relationships.
A good relationship can exist only between two strong and independent persons. So many times dependency has been confused as love and over the years society has strengthened the relationship between the two. Today however, we are seeing the ill effects of dependency within the relationship and it's impact on love.
Dependency may appear to be love because it causes people to attach themselves to one another, but in actuality, it is not. It actually diminishes a persons ability to give "real" love to another. Individual sufficiency and an understanding of the wants and needs of the other as well as possessing a sincere and heartfelt desire for the significant other to grow and mature as person in their own right is a reflection of the true love that creates healthy, sustainable, and enriching relationships.
Many people are generally confused towards the nature of love. A person may think that because his mother never let him ride the bus to school until his senior year out of fear of his getting hurt would be love. Actually what motivated the mother could have been something other than love. This would deal in a person's conscious and unconscious purpose in the mind.
One cannot love another unless he or she loves themselves first. It would be impossible, for example, to shun our own self discipline and at the same time be disciplined in our care for another. In other words, we cannot be a source of strength or companionship to someone if we are not the same to ourselves. If we neglect that aspect of who we are the relationship, no matter how passionate or dedicated it appears to be, will be short lived as a result of a break down in the commitment on one end.
Today, there is this view of love as being "feminized love". A term coined by Sociologist A. Douglass in 1977. He claims society today has taken the concept of love and put it into a nice little package which defines love in terms only of emotional expression, verbal self disclosure, and affection. This leaves no room for the physical aspects of love. By physical, I am not talking about the outward display of physical attraction, but the providing of instrumental help in physical activities.
To reinforce this, another study was conducted by Stinnett, Carter, and Montgomery in 1972 in which by questionnaire, couples were asked to define the basic needs of marriage. Among those listed were love, personality, fulfillment, respect, communication, finding meaning, and integrating past experiences. Love itself was measured by feelings. Providing help in the physical sense was not reflected upon.
Also, men and women tend to have different views and ways of loving. Women, on one hand tend to express love in a verbal sense, wanting to share personal experiences and feel emotionally secure. On the other hand, men show their love by more physical means, such as helping in activities and the obvious, sex.
Love also gives men a certain aspect of power over women. Study upon study has shown that the current concept of love has exaggerated women's dependency on men because society tends to put across the view that women need a love based relationship more than men and this puts women at a disadvantage. However, there is another approach and view that suggests men also depend on marriage as a form of secure loving relations more than women. Women tend to have closer ties to friends and relatives which reduces the need for a companion.
Because in today's society we emphasize self growth and autonomy, most people have unconscious weapons against dependency in love relationships.
A good relationship can exist only between two strong and independent persons. So many times dependency has been confused as love and over the years society has strengthened the relationship between the two. Today however, we are seeing the ill effects of dependency within the relationship and it's impact on love.
Dependency may appear to be love because it causes people to attach themselves to one another, but in actuality, it is not. It actually diminishes a persons ability to give "real" love to another. Individual sufficiency and an understanding of the wants and needs of the other as well as possessing a sincere and heartfelt desire for the significant other to grow and mature as person in their own right is a reflection of the true love that creates healthy, sustainable, and enriching relationships.



























